- Eraxis® has greater efficacy than fluconazole in the treatment of invasive candidiasis and has a safety profile similar to that of fluconazole2
- Treatment with Eraxis® was successful in 76% of patients versus 60% among those treated with fluconazole at the end of intravenous (IV) therapy2 (p=0.01)

*p value for 6-week follow-up was not presented in Reboli et al2; mITT, modified intent-to-treat
Double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority study in patients aged ≥16 years (n=245) with invasive candidiasis; Primary efficacy analysis: Global response (clinical and microbiologic) at end of IV therapy in patients who had a positive baseline culture; Subjects received either IV Eraxis® (anidulafungin) (200 mg on day 1, then 100 mg/day) or IV fluconazole (800 mg on day 1, then 400 mg/day) for 14 to 42 days and for at least 14 days after a negative blood culture and improvement in signs and symptoms; Signs and symptoms were assessed at baseline, daily during treatment, at end of IV therapy, at end of oral therapy, and 2 and 6 weeks after end of all antifungal therapy

Randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of 256 patients with candidemia and/or other forms of invasive candidiasis; Patients received either Eraxis® (anidulafungin) (200-mg loading dose, 100-mg maintenance dose) or IV fluconazole (800-mg loading dose, 400-mg maintenance dose); either agent could be followed by oral fluconazole after ≥10 days of IV therapy
- The increased response rates with Eraxis® were most likely a consequence of the fungicidal effects of Eraxis® rather than the fungistatic effects of fluconazole2
- The majority of Candida isolates, including Candida glabrata, were sensitive to fluconazole2
|